Previous page Print
Previous page Print

HYUNDAI TOKYO Container Ship Major Marine Occurrence


  • facebook
  • twitter
  • Line
Category
Collision
ShipType
Container ship/Bulk carrier /Dry cargo ship
Date
2023-03-20
Area
Kaohsiung Port

Description

On 20th March 2023, the container ship, HYUNDAI TOKYO (IMO No. 9305673), contacted the wharf No.77 in Kaohsiung Port during the berthing and caused bulbous bow and wharf damage. No oil pollution in this occurrence.

Stage

At 0905LT on March 20th, 2023, a Cyprus-registered container ship Hyundai Tokyo, IMO number 9305673, with a gross tonnage of 74651, LOA 303 meters, a width of 40 meters, and a total container capacity of 6,987 TEU, entered the No.2 entrance of the Kaohsiung Port and contacted berth 77 during berthing, causing damage to the ship’s bulbous bow and the berth itself. No casualties or environmental pollution resulted from this occurrence.

Investigation Found

    About Possible Causes
    1. The pilot on the day of the occurrence had a blood alcohol concentration exceeding the standards recognized by the domestic and international transportation industries and related regulations as "not fit for safe navigation." It was assessed that due to the pilot's alcohol-induced effect, there was a delay in reaction during the navigation and operation of the vessel.
    2. When the pilot was navigating the Hyundai Tokyo into the No. 2 entrance of Kaohsiung Port, the ship's speed was 7.4 knots. Upon being alerted by the tugboat captain about the excessive speed, the pilot initiated a reduction in speed. After passing the VTS tower, the ship's captain reminded the pilot to initiate a turn. Subsequently, the pilot ordered a hard starboard, indicating delayed decision-making during piloting. This resulted in the ship's inability to promptly reduce speed and initiate the turn, ultimately leading to the ship making contact with the berth, resulting in damage to both the ship and the berth.

    About Risk
    1. The pilot navigating the Hyundai Tokyo toward the berth, and as the bow gradually approached the pier and the distance shorted, the decision to apply reverse thrust was delayed, and no emergency anchoring was deployed to restrain the ship's forward speed during the process.
    2. Before the Hyundai Tokyo contacted the berth, it did not have tugboats on towlines, resulting in the inability to provide immediate assistance to reduce speed. This shows that the pilot did not utilize tugboats effectively in this berthing plan.
    3. During the Hyundai Tokyo's maneuver to turn starboard in the turning basin of the No. 2 entrance of Kaohsiung Port at a higher speed (6.3 knots), when the ship initiated a portside turn, the captain of the Hyundai Tokyo did not question the pilot's decision during this process. Before making contact with the berth, the captain verbally reminded the pilot to take more effective measures but did not take over the ship’s control when the emergency situation occurred.
    4. If the bridge team of Hyundai Tokyo proactively followed the relevant provisions of IMO Resolution A.960(23) regarding the responsibilities of the master, officer of the watch, and pilot, as well as the relationship between the master and the pilot, by conducting effective information exchange during the pilotage process, assessing the feasibility of the pilot's berthing plan, monitoring the contents of the pilot's berthing plan, and taking assistance or taking over actions during the pilotage process, it may reduce the risk of occurrence.
    5. The domestic authority of maritime affairs has not regulated the composition and legal status of pilot offices. Each pilot operates independently without hierarchical relationships among them. Additionally, the pilot offices have not established internal control or safety management regulations or systems, nor has the Maritime Port Bureau of the Ministry of Transportation and communications imposed any requirements in this regard. As a result, the pilot offices lacked explicit rights and obligations in terms of supervising, managing, and assessing the pilots under their jurisdiction. They also lacked legally binding force, thus unable to effectively fulfill their management functions.
    6. If Kaohsiung Port has relevant regulations regarding the standby positions for tugboats, requiring vessels to have tug assistance and provide support before entering the turning basin, and also to quickly offer assistance in emergencies, it would help reduce the risk of occurrences.
    7. The pilot did not engage in effective information exchange with the bridge team of Hyundai Tokyo after boarding, failing to meet the requirements of IMO Resolution A.960(23) regarding the information exchange between the master and the pilot. This lack of information exchange could increase the risk of maneuvering occurrences in the port.
    8. The pilot involved in 3 occurrences (including the current one) within the past 6 months can continue practicing under the current system in our country until the occurrence investigation concludes. However, the current practice of the Maritime and Port Bureau of the Ministry of Transportation and communications lacks a regular safety supervision, management, and audit system for pilot offices. There is no regular occupational assessment or skill certification for pilots during employment, and there are no restrictions on practicing for those who fail the assessment or certification. This has resulted in the Maritime and Port Bureau being unable to fully understand and ensure the occupational suitability of pilots and effectively exercise its supervisory and management functions.
    9. Our country lacks standards and regulations regarding alcohol concentration and alcohol testing for pilots on duty. Although after the occurrence, the supervising authority issued administrative orders requiring pilots in each port area to undergo alcohol testing before each shift, the detailed execution rules and penalties are still in the planning stage.
    10. Our country's current medical examination for pilots lacks comprehensive standards, fails to provide guidance on medical examination for pilots to explain the methods and principles of examination, and does not require medical examiners to understand the examinee's medical history including medication and treatments, treatment outcomes and complications, side effects of treatments, and alcohol use. These may lead to a variation of examination procedures by different hospitals and thus examination results may fail to ensure the fitness of pilots to safely perform their duty, thus affecting pilotage safety.

    Other
    1. The fatigue risk assessment analysis results indicate that pilots on night shifts may experience disruptions in their circadian rhythms and daily routines, making it difficult to recover from fatigue after duty. Compared to other shift types, continuous night shifts significantly increase the likelihood of high fatigue levels during duty.
    2. Our country's maritime administration, lacks dedicated maritime administrative investigation personnel at the moment. The administrative investigators currently handle multiple duties and are unable to fully devote themselves to maritime investigations. This situation may have a certain impact on the efficiency and quality of investigations, and it may also reduce opportunities to improve safety and preventive measures for similar occurrences.

回頁首